NOVEMBER 2022 VOTER GUIDE: WISCONSIN
EDITOR’S NOTE: Only those specifically notated have received Regular Joe’s endorsement. All other races are just a listing of the Republican candidates running in the primary.
Governor: Tim Michels – Info Here
Lt. Governor: Roger Roth – Info Here
Attorney General: Eric Toney – Info Here ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe~
Secretary of State: Amy Lynn Loudenbeck – Info Here
State Treasurer: John Leiber – Info Here
US Senator: Ron Johnson Info Here ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe ~US Congress
US Congress
District 1: Bryan Steil (i)
District 2: Erik Olsen
District 3: Derrick Van Orden ~Endorsed by Regular Joe~
District 4: Tim Rogers
District 5: Scott Fitzgerald (i)
District 6: Glen Grothman – Info Here ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe ~
District 7: Tom Tiffany – Info Here ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe ~
District 8: Mike Gallagher – Info Here
Jacob VandenPlas (Libertarian) – Info Here
State Senate
| District 1 | Andre Jacque (i)~ Endorsed by Regular Joe ~ |
| District 3 | Angel Sanchez |
| District 5 | Rob Hutton |
| District 7 | Peter Gilbert |
| District 9 | Devin LeMahieu (i) |
| District 11 | Stephen Nass (i) ~Endorsed by Regular Joe~ |
| District 13 | John Jagler (i) |
| District 15 | Mark Trofimchuck |
| District 17 | Howard Marklein (i) |
| District 19 | Rachael Cabral-Guevara |
| District 21 | Van Wanggaard (i) |
| District 23 | Jesse James |
| District 25 | Romaine Quinn |
| District 27 | Robert Relph |
| District 29 | Cory Tomczyk~Endorsed by Regular Joe |
| District 31 | David Estenson |
| District 33 | Chris Kapenga (i) |
State Assembly Seats
1st District: Joel Kitchens (Incumbent) – Info Here
2nd District: Shae Sortwell – Info Here
3rd District: Ron Tusler (i)
4th District: David Steffen
5th District (Steineke’s seat): Joy Goeben ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe~
6th District (Tauchen’s seat): Dean Neubert -Write-in Candidate Info Here~ Endorsed by Regular Joe~
7th District: Zachary Marshall
8th District: No Republican candidate
9th District: Ryan M. Antczak
10th District: No Republican candidate
11th District: No Republican candidate
12th District: Greg Canady
13th District: Tom Michalski
14th District: Keva Turner
15th District: Dave Maxey
16th District: No Republican candidate.
17th District: Abie Eisenbach
18th District: No Republican candidate.
19th District: No Republican candidate.
20th District: Scott Hermann
21st District: Jessie Rodriguez (i)
22nd District: Janel Brandtjen (i) ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe~
23rd District: Purnima Nath
24th District: Daniel Knodl (i)
25th District: Paul Tittl (i)
26th District: Terry Katsma (i)
27th District: Amy Binsfeld
28th District: Gae Magnafici (i)
29th District: Clint Moses (i)
30th District: Shannon Zimmerman (i)
31st District: Ellen Schutt
32nd District: Tyler August (i)
33rd District: Scott Johnson
34th District: Rob Swearingen (i)
35th District: Calvin Callahan (i)
36th District: Jeffrey Mursau (i)
37th District: William Penterman (i)
38th District: Barbara Dittrich (i)
39th District: Mark Born (i)
40th District: Kevin Petersen (i)
41st District: Alex Dallman (i)
42nd District: Jon Plumer (i)
43rd District: Marisa Voelkel
44th District: Spencer Zimmerman
45th District: Jeff Klett
46th District: Andrew McKinney
47th District: Lamonte Newsom
48th District: No Republican candidate.
49th District: Travis Tranel (i)
50th District: Tony Kurtz (i)
51st District: Todd Novak (i)
52nd District: Jerry O’Connor
53rd District: Michael Schraa (i)
54th District: Donnie Herman
55th District: Nate Gustafson
56th District: Dave Murphy (i)
57th District: Andrew Fox
58th District: Rick Gundrum (i)
59th District: Ty Bodden ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe~
60th District: Robert Brooks (i)
61st District: Amanda Nedweski
62nd District: Robert Wittke (i)
63rd District: Adam Steen (Write-in) ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe~
64th District: Ed Hibsch
65th District: Frank Petrick
66th District: No Republican candidate.
67th District: Rob Summerfield (i)
68th District: Karen Hurd
69th District: Donna Rozar (i)
70th District: Nancy VanderMeer (i)
71st District: Scott Soik
72nd District: Scott Krug (i)
73rd District: Angie Sapik
74th District: Chanz Green
75th District: David Armstrong (i)
76th District: No Republican candidate.
77th District: No Republican candidate.
78th District: Matt Neuhaus
79th District: Victoria Fueger
80th District: Jacob Luginbuhl
81st District: Shellie Benish
82nd District: Chuck Wichgers (i)~Endorsed by Regular Joe~
83rd District: Nik Rettinger
84th District: Robert Donovan
85th District: Patrick Snyder (i)
86th District: John Spiros (i)
87th District: James Edming (i)
88th District: John Macco (i)
89th District: Elijah Behnke (i) ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe~
90th District: Micah Behnke ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe~
91st District: Josh Stanley
92nd District: Treig Pronschinske (i)
93rd District: Warren Petryk (i)
94th District: Ryan Huebsch
95th District: Chris Woodard
96th District: Loren Oldenburg (i)
97th District: Scott Allen (i)
98th District: Adam Neylon (i)
99th District: Cindi Duchow (i)
Brown County
Sheriff: Todd Delain ~ Endorsed by Regular Joe ~
Chippewa County
Sheriff: Travis Hakes
Dane County
Sheriff: Anthony Hamilton
Eau Claire
Sheriff: Don Henning
Forest County
Sheriff: Jeffrey Marvin
Iowa County
Sheriff: Michael Peterson
Kenosha County
Sheriff: David Zoerner
LaCrosse County
Sheriff: Fritz Leinfelder,
Lincoln County
Sheriff: Ken Schneider
Oconto County
Sheriff: Todd Skarban ~Endorsed by Regular Joe
Portage County
Sheriff: Scott Kenneth Noble
Rock County
Sheriff: No Republican Candidate
Sauk County
Sheriff: Chip Meister
Shawano County
Sheriff: George Lenzner
Clerk of Courts: Ethan Schmidt
County Coroner: Brian Westfahl
Sheboygan County
Sheriff: Cory Roeseler
Vernon County
Sheriff: Roy Torgerson
Referendums:
| Jurisdiction | Question |
| ADAMS COUNTY | Should the State of Wisconsin establish a Right to Clean Water to protect human health, the environment, and the diverse Cultural and natural heritage of Wisconsin? |
| ADAMS COUNTY | Shall the Adams-Friendship Area School District, Adams County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,700,000 for the 2022-2023 school year, by $3,200,000 for the 2023-2024 school year, by $3,700,000 for the 2024-2025 school year and by $4,000,000 for the 2025-2026 school year, for non-recurring purposed consisting of operational and maintenance expenses? |
| BARRON COUNTY | Shall the School Board of the Prairie Farm Public School District be authorized to exceed the revenue limit under Section 121.91 of the Wisconsin Statutes beginning with the 2023-2024 school year through the 2027-28 school year on a nonrecurring basis by an amount not to exceed $850,000 each year for the purpose of paying District operation, staffing and maintenance costs as provided in the foregoing resolution? |
| BAYFIELD COUNTY | Should the State of Wisconsin establish a right to clean water to protect human health, the environment, and the diverse cultural and natural heritage of Wisconsin? |
| BROWN COUNTY | Should the State of Wisconsin prohibit election officials from soliciting or using private funds, technology, or services from special interest groups, people, or other private entities for the purpose of administering elections and referendums? |
| BROWN COUNTY | Shall the School District of Denmark, Brown, Manitowoc and Kewaunee Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $925,000 per year beginning with the 2023-2024 school year and ending with the 2025-2026 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operating expenses, including ongoing educational programming and maintenance, transportation and technology? |
| BROWN COUNTY | Shall the School District of Denmark, Brown, Manitowoc and Kewaunee Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $31,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of an addition and renovations at the Elementary School, including an early childhood center, cafeteria, gymnasium and secure entrance; site improvements; possible removal of the current early childhood center; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| BROWN COUNTY | Shall the Green Bay Area Public School District, Brown County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $92,605,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: district-wide safety, security, building infrastructure and capital maintenance improvements; renovations and facility updates to secondary schools; construction of an addition at certain district buildings; district-wide athletic facility and site improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| BROWN COUNTY | Shall the Pulaski Community School District, Brown, Oconto, Shawano and Outagamie Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,500,000 for the 2023-2024 school year, by $1,600,000 for the 2024-2025 school year, by $1,700,000 for the 2025-2026 school year, by $1,800,000 for the 2026-2027 school year and by $1,900,000 for the 2027-2028 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of compensating and providing benefits to teachers and staff, maintaining programs and services, and operating facilities? |
| BROWN COUNTY | Shall the Pulaski Community School District, Brown, Oconto, Shawano and Outagamie Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $69,800,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: construction of additions, renovations and safety improvements at Hillcrest and Sunnyside Elementary Schools; construction of a Technical Education addition and renovations at the High School; district-wide building systems, capital maintenance and site improvements, accessibility updates and renovations; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| CALUMET COUNTY | INITIAL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $8,270,000 BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of the School District of Hilbert, Calumet County, Wisconsin, that there shall be issued, pursuant to Chapter 67, Wisconsin Statutes, General Obligation Bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,270,000 for the purpose of paying the costs of improvements to the District’s K-12 school building including: additions and renovations to the facilities for career and technical education, band and choir and the locker room/fitness center; expansion and updates to the current lunchroom/commons area; and equipment acquisition related to said projects. Shall the foregoing resolution of the School Board of the School District of Hilbert be approved? |
| CALUMET COUNTY | RESOLUTION TO EXCEED REVENUE CAP COMMENCING WITH THE 2022-23 SCHOOL YEAR BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of the School District of Hilbert, Calumet County, Wisconsin, that the final school district budget shall include an amount of $200,000 each year in excess of the revenue limits imposed by Section 121.91 of the Wisconsin Statutes commencing with the 2022-23 school year on a recurring basis for the purpose of paying the costs of District staffing and acquiring career and technical education equipment. Shall the School Board of the School District of Hilbert be authorized to exceed the revenue limit under Section 121.91 of the Wisconsin Statutes by an amount of $200,000 each year commencing with the 2022-23 school year on a recurring basis for the purpose of paying the costs of District staffing and acquiring career and technical education equipment as provided in the foregoing resolution? |
| CITY OF APPLETON – MULTIPLE COUNTIES | Should marijuana be legalized for use by those 21 and over, taxed, and regulated like alcohol in the State of Wisconsin? |
| CITY OF BURLINGTON – MULTIPLE COUNTIES | Please answer the following questions to assist the Common Council in determining the level of interest and commitment that City of Burlington taxpayers have in the following proposed project. This information will be used by the Common Council to assist in making a decision on this issue. This referendum is advisory only: Echo Lake Dam needs significant repairs in order to make the dam comply with state law. The city has received one million dollars ($1,000,000) in grant funding and additional dollars may still be available to reduce the overall estimated project costs. In order to remedy this situation, should the City of Burlington: Option 1: Remove the dam, draining Echo Lake, and restoring the resulting natural stream area with new park amenities, which is currently estimated to cost taxpayers $7.7 million? OR, Option 2: Repair the dam, keep and dredge Echo Lake, and expand existing park amenities, which is currently estimated to cost taxpayers $8.1 million? |
| CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS – CHIPPEWA COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the City of Chippewa Falls for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 1.477%, which results in a levy of $8,078,159. Shall the City of Chippewa Falls be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of increasing both the Police Department and the Fire & Emergency Services Department wages for existing personnel and to hire additional personnel in each department, by a total of 15.199%, which results in a levy of $9,305,950, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $1,227,791 for each fiscal year going forward? |
| CITY OF COLUMBUS – MULTIPLE COUNTIES | Shall The City of Columbus allow all City streets to be recreational ATV/UTV routes? |
| CITY OF EAU CLAIRE – MULTIPLE COUNTIES | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the City of Eau Claire for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 3.472%, which results in a levy of $49,178,662. Shall the City of Eau Claire be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023 for the purpose of employing six (6) additional Firefighter/Paramedics, six (6) additional Police Officers, two (2) Civilian Community Service Officers, and one (1) Civilian Law Enforcement Associate to support Civilian 911 Dispatchers, by a total of 2.945%, which results in a levy of $50,626,794, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $1,448,132 for each fiscal year going forward? |
| CITY OF KAUKAUNA – MULTIPLE COUNTIES | Shall the City of Kaukauna, Outagamie County, Wisconsin change the City Attorney position from elected to a hired position? |
| CITY OF KENOSHA – KENOSHA COUNTY | “Should marijuana be legalized for adult use, taxed, and regulated like alcohol?” |
| CITY OF MIDDLETON – DANE COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the City of Middleton for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 2.5%, which results in a levy of $19,781,229. Shall the City of Middleton be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of additional police, parks, communications staffing and employment in cost increases by a total of 3.9%, which results in a levy of $20,551,229, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $770,000 for each fiscal year going forward? |
| CITY OF RACINE – RACINE COUNTY | Should marijuana be legalized for adult-use, taxed, and regulated like alcohol? |
| CITY OF RACINE – RACINE COUNTY | Should Wisconsin Statutes section 940.04, which bans abortion at any stage of pregnancy without exception for rape, incest, or health of the patient, be repealed to ensure legal access to abortion care? |
| CITY OF STEVENS POINT – PORTAGE COUNTY | Should marijuana be legalized for adult-use, taxed, and regulated like alcohol in the State of Wisconsin? |
| CITY OF STEVENS POINT – PORTAGE COUNTY | Shall the City of Stevens Point construct a railroad sidetrack on the southside of the existing CN mainline from approximately Burbank Road to approximately Brilowski Road including the installation of all necessary ballast, track, and switchgear at an estimated cost of $4,l00,000? |
| CITY OF STEVENS POINT – PORTAGE COUNTY | Shall the City of Stevens Point construct an extension of Badger Avenue from EM Copps Drive to County Trunk Highway HH including the installation of pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk and/or pedestrian path, related stormwater infrastructure and final restoration and landscaping at an estimated cost of $1,800,000? |
| CITY OF STEVENS POINT – PORTAGE COUNTY | Shall the City of Stevens Point reconstruct Minnesota Avenue from Clark Street to Jefferson Street, Algoma Street from Minnesota Avenue to Texas Avenue, and Texas Avenue from its north termini to Jefferson Street, including the replacement and/or installation of all pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk at an estimated cost of $1,900,000? |
| CITY OF STEVENS POINT – PORTAGE COUNTY | Shall the City of Stevens Point resurface Bush Street from Sunset Boulevard to Indiana Avenue, Indiana Avenue from Bush Street to Channel Drive, Channel Drive from Heffron Street to its northerly termini, Lindbergh Avenue from Bush Street to Heffron Street, Frontenac Avenue from Bush Street to Belke Street, Soo Marie Avenue from Bush Street to Belke Street, and Belke Street from Lindbergh Avenue to Frontenac Avenue including the replacement of all pavement at an estimated cost of $2,200,000? |
| CITY OF SUPERIOR – DOUGLAS COUNTY | Should marijuana be legalized for adults over the age of 21, taxed, and regulated like alcohol? |
| CITY OF WHITEWATER – MULTIPLE COUNTIES | “Under state law, the increase in the levy of the City of Whitewater for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year 2023 is limited to 7.673%, which results in a levy of $4,656,852. Shall the City of Whitewater be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year 2023 for the purpose of establishing, staffing and operating a City of Whitewater Municipal Government Fire and Emergency Services Department (Municipal Department), by a total of 23.621%, which results in a levy of $5,756,852, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $1,100,000 for each fiscal year going forward?” |
| CLARK COUNTY | Shall the School District of Loyal, Clark County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,100,000 for the 2023-2024 school year for non-recurring purposes consisting of building maintenance and school operational expenses, and by $1,400,000 per year for the 2024-2025 school year through the 2027-2028 school year for non-recurring purposes consisting of school operational expenses? |
| CRAWFORD COUNTY | Shall the North Crawford School District, Crawford, Richland and Vernon Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $300,000 for the 2022-2023 school year; by an additional $250,000 (for a total of $550,000) for the 2023-2024 school year; by an additional $200,000 (for a total of $750,000) for the 2024-2025 school year; and by an additional $150,000 (for a total of $900,000) for the 2025-2026 school year and thereafter, for recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses? |
| CRAWFORD COUNTY | Shall the North Crawford School District, Crawford, Richland and Vernon Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,500,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project at the school building and site consisting of: capital maintenance, building infrastructure and site improvements, including roof and window replacement; renovations and facility updates, including Americans with Disabilities Act improvements and upgrades to instructional space; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| CRAWFORD COUNTY | Shall the revenues included in the budget of the School District of Wauzeka-Steuben, Crawford County, Wisconsin, be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by an additional $352,000 for the 2022-2023 school year, by $950,000 for each of the 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 school years, and by $1,100,000 for the 2025-2026 school year for non-recurring purposes, consisting of paying the costs of operation, educational programs and maintenance of the District? |
| DANE COUNTY | Should marijuana be legalized, taxed, and regulated in the same manner as alcohol for adults 21 years of age or older? |
| DANE COUNTY | Should all records of previous convictions for marijuana possession in small amounts in the State of Wisconsin be expunged? |
| DANE COUNTY | Should Wisconsin Statute 940.04, which bans abortion at any stage of pregnancy without exception for rape, incest, or health of the patient, be repealed to ensure legal access to abortion care? |
| DANE COUNTY | Shall the School District of Belleville, Dane and Green Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $999,999 beginning with the 2022-2023 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses? |
| DANE COUNTY | Shall the Middleton-Cross Plains Area School District, Dane County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $7,345,000 for the 2023-2024 school year, by $13,790,000 for the 2024-2025 school year, by $19,435,000 for the 2025-2026 school year and $24,900,000 for the 2026-2027 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of expenses related to the ongoing educational and extracurricular programming, and compensation, and other operational expenses? |
| DANE COUNTY | Shall the Mount Horeb Area School District, Dane and Iowa Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $4,820,000 beginning with the 2023-2024 school year and continuing indefinitely, for recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses related to attracting and retaining staff, maintaining current programs and services and paying for increasing costs? |
| DANE COUNTY | Shall the Oregon School District, Dane, Green, and Rock Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $5,420,000 for 2022-2023 school year; by an additional $3,000,000 (for a total of $8,420,000) for the 2023-2024 school year; and by an additional $2,980,000 (for a total of $11,400,000) for the 2024-2025 school year and thereafter, for recurring purposes consisting of expenses to pay compensation and to sustain District instruction and operations? |
| DANE COUNTY | Questions Number I: Shall the Stoughton Area School District, Dane and Rock Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $36,300,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of district-wide building systems, safety, security, energy efficiency, capital maintenance and site improvements; remodeling at the High School, removal of the prior Yahara Elementary School building; removal of the current maintenance building and construction of a replacement maintenance building; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures, and equipment? |
| DANE COUNTY | Question Number II: Shall the Stoughton Area School District, Dane and Rock Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $11,700,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of construction of a gymnasium addition at River Bluff Middle School; removal of the current Community Gym building; related safety and site improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures, and equipment? |
| DANE COUNTY | Shall the Sun Prairie Area School District, Dane and Columbia Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $9,000,000 beginning with the 2022-2023 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of expenses related to maintaining class sizes, student services and staff compensation, providing for substitute teacher coverage, increasing mental health services for students, and ongoing safety and facility maintenance? |
| DANE COUNTY | Shall the Verona Area School District, Dane County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $19,000,000 for the 2022-2023 school year and thereafter, for recurring purposes consisting of expenses related to ongoing educational programming, maintaining and supporting instructional and extracurricular programs, and paying salary and other operational expenses? |
| DANE COUNTY | Question Number I: Shall the Waunakee Community School District, Dane County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $175,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of a new Heritage Elementary School on district-owned land; construction of a new middle school on district-owned land; removal of the current Heritage Elementary School building; district-wide renovations; capital maintenance and site improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures, and equipment? |
| DANE COUNTY | Question II: Shall the Waunakee Community School District, Dane County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,000,000 for the 2022-2023 school year, by $3,000,000 for the 2023-2024 school year, and by $6,000,000 for the 2024-2025 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of expenses related to attracting and retaining staff, operating and maintaining any additional school facilities, and maintaining current programs and services? |
| DODGE COUNTY | Question: Shall the Waupun Area School District, Dodge and Fond du Lac Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $980,000 per year for three years beginning with the 2022-2023 school year and ending with the 2024-2025 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses, including to maintain facilities and small class sizes, to sustain and expand educational programming, and to pay salaries and benefits? |
| DUNN COUNTY | Shall Congress and the President of the United States enact into law the creation of a publicly financed, non-profit, national health insurance program that would fully cover medical care costs for all Americans? |
| EAU CLAIRE COUNTY | Should cannabis be legalized for adult use by Wisconsin residents at least 21 years of age, and in addition, be taxed and regulated in a manner similar to alcohol possession and use? |
| EAU CLAIRE COUNTY | “Shall the Eau Claire Area School District, Eau Claire, Chippewa and Dunn Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $98,600,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of additions and renovations at Memorial and North High, South Middle and Putnam Heights Elementary Schools; capital maintenance, building infrastructure, and site and extra-curricular facility improvements at Locust Lane, Manz, Meadowview, Northwoods, Putnam Heights, Sam Davey and Sherman Elementary, Northstar and South Middle, and Memorial and North High Schools; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment?” |
| EAU CLAIRE COUNTY | Question Number I: Shall the School District of Augusta, Eau Claire County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $10,500,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: construction of additions and renovations at the Elementary School and the Middle/High School; district-wide capital maintenance, building infrastructure, safety and site improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| EAU CLAIRE COUNTY | Question Number II: Shall the School District of Augusta, Eau Claire County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,500,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of the construction of an addition for and equipping of a new gymnasium and related facility renovations and improvements at the Elementary School? |
| FOND DU LAC COUNTY | “Shall the Ripon Area School District, Fond du Lac, Winnebago and Green Lake Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $850,000 per year beginning with the 2022-2023 school year and ending with the 2027-2028 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of expenses related to sustaining general operations?” |
| FOND DU LAC COUNTY | Shall the School District of North Fond du Lac, Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $800,000 per year for the 2022-2023 school year through the 2024-2025 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses, including to maintain class sizes, current programs and services and to operate additional space? |
| FOND DU LAC COUNTY | Shall the School District of North Fond du Lac, Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $18,500,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of additions, including for classrooms and labs, renovations and building infrastructure improvements at Bessie Allen Middle School; construction of additions, including for classrooms, a cafeteria and physical education space, renovations and site improvements at Horace Mann High School; renovations, building infrastructure, removal of an older portion of the building, safety and site improvements at the Early Learning Center; site improvements at Treffert Way Charter School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| GRANT COUNTY | Shall the School District of Cuba City, Grant and Lafayette Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $26,850,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a district-wide school facility improvement project consisting of: building infrastructure and capital maintenance improvements, construction of an addition, including for a fitness center, a multipurpose room and a gymnasium, and renovations at the Middle/High School; building infrastructure, capital maintenance and site improvements at the Elementary School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| GRANT COUNTY | Shall the School District of Cuba City, Grant and Lafayette Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $200,000 beginning with the 2023-2024 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses? |
| GRANT COUNTY | INITIAL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $36,000,000 BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of the School District of Platteville, Grant, Iowa and Lafayette Counties, Wisconsin, that there shall be issued, pursuant to Chapter 67, Wisconsin Statutes, General Obligation Bonds in an amount not to exceed $36,000,000 for the purpose of paying the cost of improvements to school district buildings and grounds including Americans with Disabilities Act and safety improvements; cafeteria/kitchen renovations at the Neal Wilkins Early Learning Center and the High School; renovations and additions to the Neal Wilkins Early Learning Center, the Middle School and the High School; improvements to the High School outdoor activities complex; parent drive and parking safety upgrades at the Westview Elementary School; and equipment and furniture acquisition related to said projects. Shall the foregoing resolution of the School Board of the School District of Platteville be approved? |
| GREEN COUNTY | Shall the State of Wisconsin establish a right to clean water to protect human health, the environment, and the diverse cultural and natural heritage of Wisconsin? |
| GREEN COUNTY | Shall the School District of Monroe, Green County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $88,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and improvement project consisting of: acquisition of land for and construction of a new high school, including a performing arts center and site improvements; removal of the current high school and site restoration; capital maintenance and mechanical system improvements at Abraham Lincoln Elementary School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY | I. RESOLUTION TO EXCEED REVENUE CAP COMMENCING WITH THE 2022-23 SCHOOL YEAR BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of the School District of Fort Atkinson, Jefferson and Rock Counties, Wisconsin, that the final school district budget beginning with the 2022-23 school year shall include an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 each year (on a recurring basis) and the following not to exceed amounts (on a non-recurring basis for a period of three years): $4,000,000 in the 2023-24 school year, $4,000,000 in the 2024-25 school year and $5,000,000 in the 2025-26 school year all in excess of the revenue limits imposed by Section 121.91 of the Wisconsin Statutes for the purpose of paying District operating costs in support of cultivating an inclusive high-performing culture of growth and community. I. QUESTION Shall the School Board of the School District of Fort Atkinson be authorized to exceed the revenue limit under Section 121.91 of the Wisconsin Statutes on a recurring basis beginning with the 2022-23 school year by an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 each year and on a non-recurring basis for a period of three years by the following not to exceed amounts: $4,000,000 in the 2023-24 school year, $4,000,000 in the 2024-25 school year and $5,000,000 in the 2025-26 school year for the purpose of paying District operating costs in support of cultivating an inclusive high-performing culture of growth and community as provided in the foregoing resolution? |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY | II. INITIAL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $22,000,000. BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of the School District of Fort Atkinson, Jefferson and Rock Counties, Wisconsin, that there shall be issued, pursuant to Chapter 67, Wisconsin Statutes, General Obligation Bonds in an amount not to exceed $22,000,000 for the purpose of paying the costs of secure entry sequence improvements, maintenance and mechanical projects at all buildings and traffic flow improvements at the high school. II. QUESTION Shall the foregoing resolution of the School Board of the School District of Fort Atkinson be approved? |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY | Question Number I: Shall the School District of Jefferson, Jefferson County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $34,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: district-wide safety, security, building systems, infrastructure and site improvements; renovations at East, West and Sullivan Elementary Schools; construction of an addition and renovations at the High School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY | Question Number II: Shall the School District of Jefferson, Jefferson County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of the construction and equipping of an athletic complex and related facilities on district-owned land, including site improvements? |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY | Shall the Lake Mills Area School District, Jefferson County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $44,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: constructing and equipping a new intermediate school on district-owned land, including site improvements; and minor district-wide improvements? |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY | Shall the Lake Mills Area School District, Jefferson County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $950,000 beginning with the 2024-2025 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses of the district, including any additional costs associated with the new intermediate school? |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY | Shall the Waterloo School District, Jefferson, Dodge, and Dane Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $700,000 per year for the 2022-2023 school year through the 2026-2027 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of sustaining educational programming and operating expenses? |
| JUNEAU COUNTY | Should the State of Wisconsin establish a right to clean water to protect human health, the environment, and the diverse cultural and natural heritage of Wisconsin? |
| KENOSHA COUNTY | Should the Wisconsin State Legislature declare the State of Wisconsin to be a Second Amendment Sanctuary State? |
| LA CROSSE COUNTY | Shall the School District of Bangor, La Crosse and Monroe Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $24,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of additions and renovations at the Elementary School, Middle/High School and Old School Gym; district-wide capital maintenance, building infrastructure, safety, security and site improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| LA CROSSE COUNTY | Shall the School District of Holmen, La Crosse County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $650,000 beginning with the 2024-2025 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of expenses related to building maintenance and technology? |
| LA CROSSE COUNTY | Shall the School District of Holmen, La Crosse County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $74,750,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project at the elementary and middle school buildings consisting of: renovations, building infrastructure, capital maintenance, safety and site improvements; construction of an addition at Evergreen Elementary School; reconstruction of an older portion of the Middle School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| LA CROSSE COUNTY | Shall the School District of La Crosse, La Crosse and Vernon Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $194,700,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: acquisition of land for and construction of a consolidated high school, including a performing arts center, athletic facilities and site improvements; renovations and improvements to the current high school buildings for conversion into middle schools; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| LA CROSSE COUNTY | Shall the School District of Onalaska, La Crosse County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,250,000 for the 2023-2024 school year, by $4,800,000 for the 2024-2025 school year, by $5,000,000 for the 2025-2026 school year, by $5,200,000 for the 2026-2027 school year and by $5,400,000 for the 2027-2028 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of ongoing operational expenses? |
| LA CROSSE COUNTY | Shall the School District of Onalaska, La Crosse County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $75,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: construction of additions, renovations, safety and security upgrades, and building infrastructure and site improvements at the Middle School; construction of additions, renovations, and building infrastructure and site improvements at the High School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| LINCOLN COUNTY | Should the State of Wisconsin prohibit election officials from soliciting or using private funds, technology, or services from special interest groups, people, or other private entities for the purpose of administering elections and referendums? |
| LINCOLN COUNTY | Shall the Merrill Area Common Public School District, Lincoln and Langlade Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $2,500,000 per year beginning with the 2023-2024 school year and ending with the 2026-2027 school year, for non-recurring purposes to fund District operational and maintenance expenses? |
| MANITOWOC COUNTY | Shall the Two Rivers Public School District, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $38,700,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: construction of additions, including classrooms and a gymnasium, and renovations at L.B. Clarke Middle School; district-wide safety, security and site improvements and building systems and technology upgrades; playground updates at the elementary and middle schools; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| MARATHON COUNTY | Question number I: Shall the School District of Athens, Marathon and Taylor Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $900,000 for the 2022-2023 school year; and by an additional $770,000 (for a total of $1,670,000) for the 2023-2024 school year and thereafter, for recurring purposes consisting of operational and maintenance expenses? |
| MARATHON COUNTY | Question Number II: Shall the School District of Athens, Marathon and Taylor Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,525,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: construction of an addition and remodeling for career and technical education at the Middle/High School; building systems, infrastructure, athletic and site improvements at district facilities; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| MARATHON COUNTY | Shall the School District of Stratford, Marathon County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $190,000 for the 2022-2023 school year, by $480,000 for the 2023-2024 school year, by $875,000 for the 2024-2025 school year, and by $1,390,000 for the 2025-2026 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses? |
| MARINETTE COUNTY | Question: Shall the Peshtigo School District, Marinette and Oconto Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $39,950,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project at the Middle/High School consisting of: construction of additions, including for a secure entrance, academic areas, technical education and a gymnasium; renovations and capital maintenance, building infrastructure, safety, accessibility and site improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| MILWAUKEE COUNTY | Should the Wisconsin Legislature prohibit the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of semi-automatic “military-style” firearms whose prohibition is allowed under the Wisconsin and United States Constitutions? |
| MILWAUKEE COUNTY | Do you favor allowing adults 21 years of age and older to engage in the personal use of marijuana, while also regulating commercial marijuana-related activities, and imposing a tax on the sale of marijuana? |
| MILWAUKEE COUNTY | Shall the Joint School District Number 2, Villages of Fox Point and Bayside, Milwaukee and Ozaukee Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $3.1 million per year for non-recurring purposes for the 2023-2024 school year through the 2026-2027 school year, in order to maintain and support instructional programs, services, and class sizes? |
| MILWAUKEE COUNTY | Shall the School District of Greenfield, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, that the revenues included in the School District budget be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes by $5,000,000 beginning in the 2023-24 school year and every school year thereafter, through the 2026-27 school year, on a non recurring basis for the purpose of operational expenditures related to sustaining class size, supporting and expanding instructional programming, attracting and retaining high-quality staff, enhancing student mental health supports, staying current with educational technology, maintaining student transportation services, and other educational expenditures? |
| OCONTO COUNTY | Shall the Gillett School District, Oconto and Shawano Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $600,000 per year, beginning with the 2023-24 school year and ending with the 2025-2026 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of funding educational programming for students. Shall the foregoing resolution of the School Board of the Gillett Public School District be approved? |
| OCONTO COUNTY | INITIAL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $37,630,000 BE IT RESOLVED by the School Board of the Oconto Falls Public School District, Oconto County, Wisconsin, that there shall be issued, pursuant to Chapter 67, Wisconsin Statutes, General Obligation Bonds in an amount not to exceed $37,630,000 for the purpose of paying the cost of constructing a new middle school; removal of the existing middle school; improvements to the elementary and high school buildings and grounds including secure entrances and roof replacements/repairs; and equipment acquisition related to said projects. Shall the foregoing resolution of the School Board of the Oconto Falls Public School District be approved? |
| ONEIDA COUNTY | Shall the School District of Rhinelander, Oneida, Lincoln and Langlade Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $4,000,000 per year beginning with the 2023-2024 school year and ending with the 2026-2027 school year for non-recurring purposes? |
| ONEIDA COUNTY | Shall the School District of Three Lakes, Oneida and Forest Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $4,250,000 per year beginning with the 2023-2024 school year and ending with the 2027-2028 school year, for nonrecurring purposes consisting of operational expenses? |
| OUTAGAMIE COUNTY | Should the State of Wisconsin establish a right to clean water to protect human health, the environment, and the diverse cultural and natural heritage of Wisconsin? |
| OUTAGAMIE COUNTY | Shall the Appleton Area School District, Outagamie, Calumet and Winnebago Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $129,800,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: district-wide updates to classroom and STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) areas, and safety and security improvements; construction of a new elementary school and related site improvements on district-owned land; remodeling and learning space updates at the elementary schools; renovations and construction of additions at the middle schools and the high schools, including for classrooms and high school fitness center and physical education space; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| OUTAGAMIE COUNTY | Shall the Appleton Area School District, Outagamie, Calumet and Winnebago Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $5,000,000 beginning with the 2023-2024 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of expenses for ongoing school building maintenance, cleaning and utility costs, staffing for STEM classes and reducing class sizes in kindergarten, first and second grades? |
| POLK COUNTY | “Shall the Clayton School District, Polk and Barron Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,545,000 beginning with the 2022-2023 school year, for recurring purposes consisting of operational expenses?” |
| PRICE COUNTY | Should the State of Wisconsin prohibit election officials from soliciting or using private funds, technology or services from special interest groups, people, or other private entities for the purpose of administering elections and referendums? |
| ROCK COUNTY | Question Number I: Shall the Parkview School District, Rock County, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $2,000,000 per year for the 2023-2024 school year through the 2025-2026 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of technology and curriculum materials, educational programming, costs associated with recruiting and retaining staff, and other operational and maintenance expenses? |
| ROCK COUNTY | Question Number II: Shall the Parkview School District, Rock County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $15,400,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school facility improvement project consisting of: construction of an addition and renovations at the Elementary School, including for classrooms, the cafeteria and kitchen, and updates to instructional areas; construction of an addition and renovations at the Junior/Senior High School, including for science, agriculture, career and technology education classrooms; district-wide building systems, infrastructure and technology improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| SAUK COUNTY | Shall the School District of Wisconsin Dells, Sauk, Adams, Columbia, Juneau, and Marquette Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $1,200,000 per year beginning with the 2022-2023 school year and ending with the 2025-2026 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of maintaining current elementary, middle and high school class sizes, technology equipment, existing career and technical education programming, along with operational costs associated with all school buildings? |
| SHEBOYGAN COUNTY | Question Number I: Shall the School District of Howards Grove, Sheboygan and Manitowoc Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $39,800,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of a middle school addition at the existing High School; construction of a secure entrance and office and renovations at the High School; district-wide updates to building infrastructure, safety and site improvements; construction of and improvements to certain athletic fields and facilities at the consolidated Middle/High School campus; removal of the current Middle School; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| SHEBOYGAN COUNTY | Question Number II: Shall the School District of Howards Grove, Sheboygan and Manitowoc Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,900,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of renovating, improving and equipping the High School gymnasium and certain athletic fields and facilities located on district-owned land? |
| SHEBOYGAN COUNTY | Shall the School District of Random Lake, Sheboygan and Ozaukee Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $29,900,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of additions at the school building, including for a secure entrance, classrooms and a cafeteria/multi-purpose space; combine and centralize two district libraries; renovations at the elementary/middle school and the high school; district-wide capital maintenance, safety and site improvements; construction of a maintenance facility; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures, technology and equipment? |
| ST. CROIX COUNTY | Question Number I: Shall the School District of Somerset, St. Croix County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $25,500,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: renovations and building systems, capital maintenance, safety and site improvements at the Elementary School; construction of an addition and renovations at the High School for an auditorium and support space; improvements to the stadium, track, field, site and related facilities; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| ST. CROIX COUNTY | Question Number II: Shall the School District of Somerset, St. Croix County, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $11,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of an addition and renovations at the High School for gymnasium space; relocation and construction of certain athletic fields; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| STATE OF WISCONSIN | Question: Shall the Moraine Park Technical College District, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds or promissory notes in an amount not to exceed $55,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of capital expenditures for the purchase or construction of buildings, building additions, remodeling and improvements, site improvements, the acquisition of sites, and the purchase of fixed and other equipment at District locations, including, but not limited to, advanced manufacturing facilities at the Fond du Lac and West Bend Campuses, a health and human services facility at the Fond du Lac Campus, and a regional fire training facility? |
| TOWN OF AGENDA – ASHLAND COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Agenda be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF ALVIN – FOREST COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Alvin be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF ASHFORD – FOND DU LAC COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Treasurer in the Town of Ashford be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF BANGOR – LA CROSSE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of town clerk or town treasurer in the Town of Bangor be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF BARABOO – SAUK COUNTY | “In lieu of elected officers, shall the persons holding the offices of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Baraboo be appointed by the Town Board?” |
| TOWN OF BARRE – LA CROSSE COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of town clerk and town treasurer, in the Town of Barre be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF BARRON – BARRON COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of Clerk/Treasurer in the Town of Barron be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF BARTELME – SHAWANO COUNTY | Shall the Town of Bartelme adopt the following resolution? Resolved, that “We the People” of the Town of Bartelme, seek to reclaim democracy from the expansion of corporate personhood rights and the corrupting influence of unlimited political contributions and spending. We stand with communities across the country to support passage of an amendment to the United States Constitution stating: 1. Only human beings — not corporations, unions, non-profits or other artificial entities — are endowed with constitutional rights, and; 2. Money is not speech, and therefore limiting political contributions and spending is not equivalent to limiting political speech. |
| TOWN OF BEAR BLUFF – JACKSON COUNTY | Shall the person holding office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Bear Bluff be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF BELMONT – PORTAGE COUNTY | SHALL THE PERSONS HOLDING THE OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK AND THE TOWN TREASURER IN THE TOWN OF BELMONT BE APPOINTED BY THE TOWN BOARD? |
| TOWN OF BERGEN – VERNON COUNTY | Shall the person holding the Office of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Bergen be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF BIG FLATS – ADAMS COUNTY | Question 1: “Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Big Flats be appointed by the Town Board?” |
| TOWN OF BIG FLATS – ADAMS COUNTY | Question 2: “Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Big Flats be appointed by the Town Board?” |
| TOWN OF BLAINE – BURNETT COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Blaine be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF BLOOMINGTON – GRANT COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Bloomington be appointed by the Town Board?” |
| TOWN OF BROOKLYN – GREEN LAKE COUNTY | Should the town open some or all town roads to ATV/UTV use? |
| TOWN OF BROTHERTOWN – CALUMET COUNTY | Shall the person(s) holding the office of the town clerk and the office of the town treasurer in the Town of Brothertown be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF CARY – WOOD COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk & Town Treasurer in the Town of Cary be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF CASSIAN – ONEIDA COUNTY | Shall the Town of Cassian Offices of Town Clerk be filled by appointed position? |
| TOWN OF CASSIAN – ONEIDA COUNTY | Shall the Town of Cassian Office of Town Treasurer be filled by appointed position? |
| TOWN OF CHARLESTOWN – CALUMET COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of the town clerk/treasurer in the town of Charlestown be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF CHRISTIANA – VERNON COUNTY | Shall the person holding the Office of Town Clerk in the Town of Christiana and the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Christiana be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF CLAYTON – WINNEBAGO COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Town of Clayton for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year is limited to 1.022% which results in a levy of $930,621.00. Shall the Town of Clayton be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year for the purpose of hiring additional administrative staff by a total of 10.763%, which results in a levy of$ 1,029,121.00? |
| TOWN OF CLOVERLAND – VILAS COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of Clerk/Treasurer, in the Town of Cloverland be appointed by the Town Board?” |
| TOWN OF DAYTON – RICHLAND COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Dayton be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF DELL PRAIRIE – ADAMS COUNTY | Should the Town of Dell Prairie adopt an ordinance providing for the operation of ATVS/UTVS on all of its Town Roads? |
| TOWN OF ERIN – WASHINGTON COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Town of Erin for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 0.973%, which results in a levy of $888,156. Shall the Town of Erin be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of road repairs, by a total of 22.519%, which results in a levy of $1,088,156 and include the increase of $200,000 for fiscal years 2024 through 2032? |
| TOWN OF EUREKA – POLK COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Eureka be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF EXETER – GREEN COUNTY | The Town Board of Exeter, Green County, Wisconsin, asks that you select one of the following two choices as your preference for how the Town may designate its roads as ATV/UTV routes: Option 1: DESIGNATE ALL TOWN ROADS as ATV/UTV Routes Option 2: DESIGNATE NO TOWN ROADS as ATV/UTV Routes |
| TOWN OF GERMANIA – SHAWANO COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of town clerk in the Town of Germania be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF GIBSON – MANITOWOC COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk-Treasurer in the Town of Gibson, Manitowoc County be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF GRAND CHUTE – OUTAGAMIE COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Town of Grand Chute for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 1.654%, which results in a levy of $15,731,174. Shall the Town of Grand Chute be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of hiring five (5) additional police officers, increasing the hours for two (2) existing support staff, and providing necessary training, equipment, and vehicles, by a total of 6.090%, which results in a levy of $16,689,174 and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $958,000 for each fiscal year going forward? |
| TOWN OF GRAND VIEW – BAYFIELD COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Grand View be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF GRAND VIEW – BAYFIELD COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Grand View be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF HAMMEL – TAYLOR COUNTY | Shall the persons holding the offices of the Town Clerk and the Town Treasurer, in the Town of Hammel, be appointed by the Town Board. |
| TOWN OF HARRISON – GRANT COUNTY | Shall the persons holding the offices of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Harrison be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF HILL – PRICE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk and the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Hill be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF HOLLAND – LA CROSSE COUNTY | “Under State law, the increase in the levy of the Town of Holland for the tax imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 2.479%, which results in a levy of $738,997. Shall the Town of Holland be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the tax levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of enhancing fire protection, by a total of 78.823%, which results in a levy of $1,321,497, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $582,500 for each fiscal year going forward?” |
| TOWN OF HOW – OCONTO COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of How be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF HOW – OCONTO COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of How be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF JACKSON – WASHINGTON COUNTY | Shall the Town of Jackson, Washington County, enter a publicly bid contract for the purpose of mandatory, town-wide solid waste and recycling collection, to be funded annually, through a special charge on Town of Jackson property tax bills |
| TOWN OF JORDAN – GREEN COUNTY | Should the Town of Jordan adopt an ordinance that permits individuals to operate ATVs/UTVs on all Town roads that are not designated as federal, state, or county highways, unless otherwise posted? |
| TOWN OF KENNAN – PRICE COUNTY | Shall the persons holding the office of Town Clerk or Town Treasurer in the Town of Kennan be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF KING – LINCOLN COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Clerk in the Town of King be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF KOSHKONONG – JEFFERSON COUNTY | Shall the use of All-Terrain Vehicles (“ATV”) and Utility Terrain Vehicles (“UTV”) continue to be permitted on Town roads? |
| TOWN OF KOSSUTH – MANITOWOC COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Kossuth be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF LA FOLLETTE – BURNETT COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Lafollette be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF LAFAYETTE – CHIPPEWA COUNTY | Shall the person(s) holding the office of town clerk and town treasurer in the Town of Lafayette be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF LAFAYETTE – CHIPPEWA COUNTY | Under Wisconsin law, the increase in the levy of the Town of Lafayette for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 3.22% (based on actual data or the political subdivision’s best estimate), which results in a levy of $30,000. Shall the Town of Lafayette be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023 and going forward for increased Sheriff’s Patrol, by a total of 6.5% (based on actual data or the political subdivision’s best estimate), which results in a levy of $1,637,000. |
| TOWN OF LAKE – PRICE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the combined office of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Lake be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF LANARK – PORTAGE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Lanark be appointed by the Town Board for up to a 3-year term? |
| TOWN OF LIBERTY – VERNON COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of town clerk in the Town of Liberty be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF LINCOLN – BURNETT COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of the town clerk in the Town of Lincoln be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF LINCOLN – BURNETT COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of town treasurer in the Town of Lincoln be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF LIND – WAUPACA COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of town clerk and town treasurer in the Town of Lind be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF LINN – WALWORTH COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Linn be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF LORAIN – POLK COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of town treasurer in the Town of Lorain be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF LOWELL – DODGE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Lowell, Dodge County, Wisconsin, be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF MAPLE PLAIN – BARRON COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of town treasurer in the Town of Maple Plain be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF MAPLEHURST – TAYLOR COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Maplehurst be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF MARION – JUNEAU COUNTY | Shall the Town of Marion hire a Clerk or Treasurer outside its boundaries should it become necessary? |
| TOWN OF MEDINA – DANE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the Office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Medina be Appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF MENTOR – CLARK COUNTY | Shall the person holding the combined office of town clerk and town treasurer in the Town of Mentor be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF MITCHELL – SHEBOYGAN COUNTY | “Shall the person(s) holding the office(s) of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Mitchell be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF MONROE – GREEN COUNTY | Shall the Town of Monroe change the office of Clerk/Treasurer from an elected position to an appointed position? |
| TOWN OF MUKWONAGO – WAUKESHA COUNTY | “Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Town of Mukwonago for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 1.39% (based on actual data or the Town’s best estimate), which results in a levy of $3,156,040. Shall the Town of Mukwonago be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of hiring and retaining additional fire fighter/emergency medical services providers, Department of Public Works personnel; Administrative personnel and Police Department personnel, by a total of 27.78% baed on actual data or the Town’s best estimate, which results in a levy of $3,977,511, and on an ongoing basis thereafter.” |
| TOWN OF NESHKORO – MARQUETTE COUNTY | Shall the persons holding the offices of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Neshkoro be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF NEVA – LANGLADE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Neva be Appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF NEW CHESTER – ADAMS COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of town treasurer in the Town of New Chester be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF NEWARK – ROCK COUNTY | Question: Should the Town of Newark adopt an ordinance that permits the operation of ATV/UTV on Town Roads excluding all State and County Highways? |
| TOWN OF NOKOMIS – ONEIDA COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of clerk in the Town of Nokomis be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF NOKOMIS – ONEIDA COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of treasurer in the Town of Nokomis be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF OCONTO FALLS – OCONTO COUNTY | Shall the persons holding the offices of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Oconto Falls be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF ORION – RICHLAND COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of town clerk in the Town of Orion be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF OSBORN – OUTAGAMIE COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Osborn be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF PACKWAUKEE – MARQUETTE COUNTY | Shall the persons holding the offices of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Packwaukee be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF PECK – LANGLADE COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the Office of Town Clerk or Town Treasurer, or both; or the combined Office of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Peck be appointed by the Town Board?” |
| TOWN OF PHELPS – VILAS COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk/Treasurer in the Town of Phelps be appointed by the Town Board?” |
| TOWN OF PLUM LAKE – VILAS COUNTY | “Shall the position of the office of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Plum Lake be split into a separate Town Clerk and a separate Town Treasurer by the Town Board?” Yes to split or No to not split |
| TOWN OF PLUM LAKE – VILAS COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Plum Lake be appointed by the Town Board?” Choose One: Elected or Appointed |
| TOWN OF PLUM LAKE – VILAS COUNTY | “Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Plum Lake be appointed by the Town Board?” Choose One: Elected or Appointed |
| TOWN OF PLYMOUTH – ROCK COUNTY | Shall the person holding the offices of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Plymouth be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF POLAR – LANGLADE COUNTY | Question: A “YES” vote signifies you agree for the Town of Polar to approve and pay costs of approximately $90,000 to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation for reconstruction and future maintenance costs of the 4′ parking lane of the existing roadway width of 44′ from Mill Road to east of Mueller Lake Road with work to commence and be paid for in year 2025. A “NO” vote signifies you agree to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation narrowing the roadway to 36′ total width at no cost to the Town of Polar? |
| TOWN OF POPPLE RIVER – FOREST COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of town clerk in the Town of Popple River be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF POYGAN – WINNEBAGO COUNTY | 1. “Shall the person holding the office of town clerk in the Town of Poygan be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF POYGAN – WINNEBAGO COUNTY | 2. “Shall the person holding the office of town treasurer in the Town of Poygan be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF PRAIRIE LAKE – BARRON COUNTY | Should the Town of Prairie Lake, Barron County open all town roads to ATV/UTV traffic? |
| TOWN OF PRINCETON – GREEN LAKE COUNTY | Should the town open town roads for ATV/UTV use? |
| TOWN OF RANDALL – KENOSHA COUNTY | Should the Town of Randall consider adopting an ordinance allowing, All-Terrain Vehicles, Golf Carts, and other motorized vehicles to travel on Town Roads in Subdivisions? The cost is unknown and may determine its feasibility. This is an advisory referendum only. |
| TOWN OF RANDOLPH – COLUMBIA COUNTY | The Town of Randolph is considering changing to a weekly garbage/biweekly recycling pickup at every residence in the township. The cost would be added to the homeowner’s tax bill beginning in 2024 for service rendered in 2023 with an approximate cost of $170-$190 per year. This would eliminate the current monthly garbage drop off offered. Are you in favor of weekly garbage/biweekly recycling pickup at every residence in the Town of Randolph with the cost being added to your tax bill? |
| TOWN OF REEDSBURG – SAUK COUNTY | “Shall the persons holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Reedsburg be appointed by the town board?” |
| TOWN OF RICHFIELD – WOOD COUNTY | Shall the persons holding the offices of town clerk & town treasurer in the Town of Richfield be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF ROOSEVELT – TAYLOR COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk and the office of Town Treasurer be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF SAINT LAWRENCE – WAUPACA COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of St Lawrence be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF SAND LAKE – BURNETT COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of the town clerk in the Town of Sand Lake be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF SAND LAKE – BURNETT COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of the town treasurer in the Town of Sand Lake be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF SCHLESWIG – MANITOWOC COUNTY | Shall the persons holding the offices of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer in the Town of Schleswig be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF SCOTT – BURNETT COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of the town clerk in the Town of Scott be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF SCOTT – BURNETT COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of the town treasurer in the Town of Scott be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF SENECA – GREEN LAKE COUNTY | “Shall the persons holding the office of town clerk and the office of town treasurer in the Town of Seneca be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF SEYMOUR – OUTAGAMIE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Seymour be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF SHARON – PORTAGE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of Clerk/Treasurer in the Town of Sharon be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF SIOUX CREEK – BARRON COUNTY | “Should the Township of Sioux Creek, Barron County, Wisconsin, allow the use of ATVs/UTVs on ALL Township roads?” |
| TOWN OF SPRING GROVE – GREEN COUNTY | Should the Town of Spring Grove, Green County, adopt an ordinance that permits individuals to operate ATV/UTV’s on designated Town Roads which are those roads in the Town not designated as federal, state, or county highways? |
| TOWN OF SPRING LAKE – PIERCE COUNTY | Shall the persons holding the offices of town clerk and town treasurer in the Town of Spring Lake be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF STANFOLD – BARRON COUNTY | Should the Town of Stanfold issue alcoholic beverage licenses allowing the sale of alcoholic beverages within the Town?” |
| TOWN OF SYLVESTER – GREEN COUNTY | Should the Town of Sylvester adopt an ordinance that permits individuals to operate ATVs/UTVs on all Town roads that are not designated as federal, state, or county highways, unless otherwise posted? |
| TOWN OF THERESA – DODGE COUNTY | Shall the persons holding the offices of town clerk and town treasurer in the Town of Theresa be appointed by the town board? |
| TOWN OF TOMAH – MONROE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of the town clerk in the Town of Tomah be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF TROY – WALWORTH COUNTY | Shall the Town of Troy adopt an ordinance that permits individuals to operate ATV/UTVs on Town roads which are those roads in the Town not designated as federal, state, or county highways? |
| TOWN OF WATERTOWN – JEFFERSON COUNTY | Question 1: May the office of Town Treasurer be an appointed position? |
| TOWN OF WATERTOWN – JEFFERSON COUNTY | Question 2: May the Town Clerk be an appointed position? |
| TOWN OF WATERTOWN – JEFFERSON COUNTY | Question 3: May the positions of Town Clerk and Town Treasurer be a combined position? |
| TOWN OF WHEATLAND – KENOSHA COUNTY | Shall a person holding the office of Town Clerk in the Town of Wheatland be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF WHEATLAND – KENOSHA COUNTY | Shall a person holding the office of Town Treasurer in the Town of Wheatland be appointed by the Town Board? |
| TOWN OF WILTON – MONROE COUNTY | Shall the person holding the office of combined town clerk and town treasurer in the Town of Wilton be appointed by the town board? |
| VERNON COUNTY | Shall the School District of Hillsboro, Vernon, Richland, Monroe, Juneau and Sauk Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $750,000 per year beginning with the 2023-2024 school year and ending with the 2026-2027 school year, for non-recurring purposes to maintain District facilities and current programs? |
| VERNON COUNTY | Shall the Viroqua Area School District, Vernon and Crawford Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $17,000,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: construction of additions for secure entrances at the Elementary and Middle/High Schools and for classrooms at the Middle/High School; district-wide renovations, building infrastructure, accessibility, safety, technical education and site improvements; and acquisition of furnishings, fixtures and equipment? |
| VERNON COUNTY | Shall the Viroqua Area School District, Vernon and Crawford Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,500,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of constructing and equipping a technical education expansion at the Middle/High School? |
| VILLAGE OF ANIWA – SHAWANO COUNTY | Shall the Village of Aniwa be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy on an ongoing basis to fund the Village of Aniwa’s portion of the increased cost of the Birnamwood Area Emergency Services to staff the emergency medical services 24/7 to ensure that when a call is made to 911 those personnel are available to respond ($9,672.00 (101.83%) for 2022 payable in 2023.)? |
| VILLAGE OF ARENA – IOWA COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Village of Arena for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 2.61%, which results in a levy of $382,104. Shall the Village of Arena be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, and an ongoing basis, for the purpose of expanding public safety services, including hiring a third full time Emergency Medical Technician, by a total of 11.9% ($35,000), which results in a levy of $417,104? |
| VILLAGE OF BOYD – CHIPPEWA COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Village of Boyd for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 1.644%, which results in a levy of $156,335. Shall the Village of Boyd be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of critical street maintenance projects, maintaining public safety services, update maintenance equipment and fire department equipment, by a total of 63.965%, which results in a levy of $256,335, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $100,000 for each fiscal year going forward? |
| VILLAGE OF ELM GROVE – WAUKESHA COUNTY | “Shall the Village of Elm Grove expend $1,700,000 for the reconstruction of Gebhardt Road including the construction of an off road pathway with the Village’s expected contribution to be $340,000 if Federal grant monies are awarded or $1,300,000 expected Village contribution if Federal grant monies are not awarded?” |
| VILLAGE OF FONTANA – WALWORTH COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Village of Fontana for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to .999% which results in a levy of $4,196,047. Shall the Village of Fontana be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of providing the Village with 24-hour emergency medical service, by a total of 16.160% which results in a levy of $4,874,124, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $678,077 for each fiscal year going forward? |
| VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN – WASHINGTON COUNTY | Shall the Village of Germantown provide water and sanitary sewer service for a fee and on an ongoing basis to customers in a portion of the Village of Richfield pursuant to the terms of an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Village of Richfield and the Village of Germantown? |
| VILLAGE OF HARRISON – MULTIPLE COUNTIES | FOR ADVISORY PURPOSES ONLY The Village of Harrison Board is planning to create an ordinance allowing for the use of ATV’s and UTV’s within the rural areas of the Village. Question Number 1: Should the Village of Harrison, as part of creating this ordinance, also include the urbanized areas in that ordinance, subject to State Laws? |
| VILLAGE OF HOLMEN – LA CROSSE COUNTY | “Under State law, the increase in the levy of the Village of Holmen for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 6.126%, which results in a levy of $4,857,433. Shall the Village of Holmen be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of enhancing Public Safety within the community through hiring more Police Officers and Firefighters / EMTs, by a total of 26.660%, which results in a levy of $6,152,433 and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $1,295,000 for each fiscal year going forward?” |
| VILLAGE OF LYNDON STATION – JUNEAU COUNTY | “Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Village of Lyndon Station for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023 is limited to 0.186%, which results in a levy of $68,933. Shall the Village of Lyndon be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of addressing village personnel needs, potentially including a full time clerk, two additional trustees, additional public works personnel, and a part-time police officer, by a total of 253.871%, which results in a levy of $243,933, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $175,000 for each fiscal year going forward?” |
| VILLAGE OF MUKWONAGO – MULTIPLE COUNTIES | “Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Village of Mukwonago for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 4.64% (based on actual data or the Village’s best estimate), which results in a levy of $6,934,162.79. Shall the Village of Mukwonago be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of hiring and retaining additional fire fighter/emergency medical services providers personnel for the Mukwonago fire department, by a total of 10.77% (based on actual data or the Village’s best estimate), which results in a levy of $7,340,511.84, and on an ongoing basis therafter.” |
| VILLAGE OF ORFORDVILLE – ROCK COUNTY | Question: Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Village of Orfordville for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 5.1%, which results in a levy of $483,720.65. Shall the Village of Orfordville be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of paying its share of expenses to the Orfordville Fire Protection District so the Orfordville Fire Protection District may hire 6 full-time employees, by a total of 34.44%, which results in a levy of $650,319.65, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $166,599 for each fiscal year going forward? |
| VILLAGE OF REDGRANITE – WAUSHARA COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Village of Redgranite for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 0.805%, which results in a levy of $317,007. Shall the Village of Redgranite be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of paying operating expenditures for public safety, public works and capital improvements, by a total of 39.431%, which results in a levy of $442,007, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $125,000 for each fiscal year going forward? |
| VILLAGE OF RIVER HILLS – MILWAUKEE COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Village of River Hills for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 0.787% which results in a levy of $3,038,080. Shall the Village of River Hills be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of maintaining existing public service levels for police, public works, general government, general fund capital improvements and capital purchases, by a total of 9.875%, which results in a levy of $3,338,080, and include the increase of $300,000 for fiscal years 2023 through 2027? |
| VILLAGE OF SHOREWOOD HILLS – DANE COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Village of Shorewood Hills for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 0.519%, which results in a levy of $3,007,936. Shall the Village of Shorewood Hills be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, to fund one new full time police officer and one new full time administrative staff, establish competitive wage rates for all staff, and adequately fund technological needs by a total of 13.298%, which results in a levy of $3,407,936, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $400,000 for each fiscal year going forward? |
| VILLAGE OF WAUNAKEE – DANE COUNTY | Should the Village construct a public outdoor aquatics facility with an estimated construction cost of $9.4 million? |
| VILLAGE OF WILLIAMS BAY – WALWORTH COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of the Village of Williams Bay for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2023, is limited to 1.674%, which results in a levy of $2,982,296. Shall the Village of Williams Bay be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2023, for the purpose of providing the Village with 24-hour emergency medical services, by a total of 31.120% which results in a levy of $3,910,373, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $928,077 for each fiscal year going forward? |
| WALWORTH COUNTY | Question: Shall the Whitewater Unified School District, Walworth, Jefferson and Rock Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $4,400,000 per year beginning with the 2023-2024 school year and ending with the 2026-2027 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of the following: maintaining targeted class sizes, maintaining student support and mental health services, maintaining comprehensive instructional and co-curricular programs, and maintaining technology, safety, and facilities infrastructure? |
| WALWORTH COUNTY | Shall the School District of Delavan-Darien, Walworth and Rock Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91, Wisconsin Statutes, by $3,800,000 per year beginning with the 2023-2024 school year and ending with the 2026-2027 school year, for non-recurring purposes consisting of operational costs to maintain class sizes, employ School Resource Officers, and support curriculum and instruction? |
| WALWORTH COUNTY | Shall the Geneva Jt. 4 School District, Town of Geneva and Town of Linn, Walworth County, be authorized to exceed the revenue limit specified in Section 121.91(2m), Wisconsin Statutes, by $750,000 in the 2023-2024 school year, by $1,000,000 in the 2024-2025 school year, by $1,250,000 in the 2025-2026 school year, and by $1,500,000 in the 2026-2027 school year for non-recurring purposes of paying the ongoing operational expenses of the school district. |
| WASHINGTON COUNTY | Under state law, the increase in the levy of Washington County for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year (2023), is limited to 3.61%, based on Washington County’s best estimate, which results in a levy of $37,734,920. Shall Washington County be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year (2023), for the purpose of funding the Washington County Anti-Crime Plan by a total of 9.89%, which results in a levy of $40,018,760, and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $3,600,000 each fiscal year going forward? |
| WASHINGTON COUNTY | Should the Wisconsin Legislature prepare and place on the statewide ballot a Constitutional Amendment requiring that election administration, access to ballots, and counting of ballots be nearly uniform as practicable? |
| WAUKESHA COUNTY | Should the Wisconsin Legislature prepare and place on the statewide ballot a Constitutional Amendment requiring that election administration, access to ballots, and counting of ballots be nearly uniform as practicable? |
| WAUKESHA COUNTY | Should the Wisconsin Legislature prepare and place on the statewide ballot a Constitutional Amendment prohibiting non-governmental entities and any individual other than election officials designated by law from funding, managing, or performing any task in election administration? |
| WAUPACA COUNTY | Shall the School District of Waupaca, Waupaca, Portage and Waushara Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,875,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of district-wide safety and security upgrades, including point of entry secure entrances and related equipment, building infrastructure improvements and capital maintenance? |
| WINNEBAGO COUNTY | Question: Shall the Menasha Joint School District, Winnebago, Calumet and Outagamie Counties, Wisconsin be authorized to issue pursuant to Chapter 67 of the Wisconsin Statutes, general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $99,700,000 for the public purpose of paying the cost of a school building and facility improvement project consisting of: the construction of a new Maplewood School on the existing site and removal of the current building; site improvements; and acquisition of furnishing, fixtures and equipment? |
| WOOD COUNTY | Should the Wisconsin Legislature create a law allowing for direct ballot initiatives for statewide legislation? |